Skip to content
On Reserve
On Reserve

A Wine Law Blog

  • About Wine Law
  • About the Author
    • Author Bio
    • Appearances
  • Services
    • Permits
    • TTB
    • New York State
  • Contact
    • Standards
  • Reviews
    • December 2014
    • February 2015
    • February 2017
    • February 2018
    • August 2019
    • February 2020
    • April 2023
On Reserve

A Wine Law Blog

MillerCoors Hit with Class Action Suit for Use of “Artfully Crafted” on Blue Moon Beer

Lindsey A. Zahn, April 30, 2015May 4, 2015

A Flood of Lawsuits and Too Much Blue Moon BeerOn April 24, 2015, a class action lawsuit was filed in state court against MillerCoors LLC, alleging that the company’s Blue Moon beer deceives consumers into thinking the product is “Craft” by marketing the brand as “Artfully Crafted” and disassociating it from MillerCoors. See Parent v. MillerCoors LLC. The plaintiff alleges that MillerCoors “goes to great lengths to disassociate Blue Moon beer from the MillerCoors name” (i.e., MillerCoors does not appear on the bottle of Blue Moon, Blue Moon’s website does not mention MillerCoors, asserting that Blue Moon is brewed by Blue Moon Brewing Company, etc.). The alcohol beverage attorney Robert Lehrman reports more about the suit on his blog here. 

As On Reserve previously reported, a number of class action lawsuits have been filed against beverage companies in regard to terms like “handmade,” “small batch,” “handcrafted,” and similar on their labels. See Post-Pom Wonderful and the Not So Wonderful Impact on Alcohol Beverages. These are terms that are not necessarily defined by regulators, but since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Pom Wonderful LLC in mid-2014, the number of lawsuits targeting alcohol beverage and food companies in the context of these terms has steadily increased. Of course, Pom Wonderful dealt with whether a competitor could bring a Lanham Act claim alleging unfair competition from false or misleading product information on food and beverage labels regulated by the FDA, and the above referenced cases were not brought on behalf of competitors (they are mostly class actions). In the class action suits currently before various courts, the focus thus far remains on beers and distilled spirits, but it may not be too long before wine is subject to similar suits.

This new case focuses significantly on how Blue Moon is represented, marketed, and advertised to the consumer with respect to allegations under California State law (i.e., misleading and deceptive advertising) and unfair business practices, but it still touches on a key term (i.e., “Craft” in “Artfully Crafted”) and how the beer is presented to the consumer.

Image from Bevlog.

For more information on wine or alcohol law, labeling, or trademark, please contact Lindsey Zahn.

DISCLAIMER: This blog post is for general information purposes only, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship results. Please consult your own attorney for legal advice.

Contemporary Wine Law Issues Wine and Advertising Wine Labeling Regulations Wine Lawsuits advertisingclass actionCraftfalse advertisingFederal Trade CommissionlabelinglawsuitlawsuitsPom Wonderfulwine labeling

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Comments (3)

  1. Pingback: Blue Moon Lawsuit: [Not] All About That Label | On Reserve: A Wine Law Blog
  2. Pingback: When is a beer a “craft” beer, and when is it not? | STEVE HEIMOFF| WINE BLOG
  3. Pingback: When is a beer a “craft” beer, and when is it not? | The Globe Trotting Wino on Wine Tourism and Tasting

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to On Reserve

Follow Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on RSS

Search Posts

Categories

Archives

Awards

©2025 On Reserve | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes