A recent federal lawsuit filed by Ad Obscura LLC (The Obscure Distillery,) a California-based craft spirits producer, against the New York State Liquor Authority (“NYSLA”) could have significant implications for interstate liquor shipping regulations in the United States according to Food & Wine‘s April 21, 2025 article titled “This Lawsuit Could Set a New Standard for Liquor Shipping in the US.”
On April 16, 2025, The Obscure Distillery filed a federal lawsuit against the NYSLA and its commissioners. The lawsuit challenges a New York law enacted in 2024 that permits in-state distilleries to ship spirits directly to New York consumers but restricts out-of-state distilleries from doing so unless their home state offers reciprocal shipping privileges to New York distilleries. Since California does not have such reciprocity with New York, The Obscure Distillery is barred from direct-to-consumer shipping in New York.
Represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, The Obscure Distillery argues that New York’s law imposes a discriminatory burden on interstate commerce, violating the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause. The lawsuit contends that the law unfairly favors in-state distilleries and those from reciprocal states, thereby hindering fair competition. The distillery seeks a declaratory judgment against the law, a permanent injunction to stop its enforcement, and reimbursement of legal costs.
The central legal issue in this suit revolves around the Commerce Clause. Generally speaking, the Commerce Clause prohibits states from enacting legislation that discriminates against or excessively burdens interstate commerce. By allowing only in-state distilleries and those from reciprocal states to ship directly to New York consumers, the law may be seen as favoring local economic interests over out-of-state competitors, a practice generally prohibited under the Commerce Clause.
If the court rules in favor of The Obscure Distillery, it could set a significant precedent affecting direct-to-consumer alcohol shipping laws nationwide. It is possible that states with similar reciprocity requirements could need to revise their laws to comply with constitutional standards, potentially expanding market access for out-of-state distilleries and altering the landscape of alcohol distribution in the U.S.
The case also touches upon the traditional three-tier system of alcohol distribution, which separates producers, distributors, and retailers. A ruling that favors direct-to-consumer shipping has the potential to challenge the existing framework, prompting a reevaluation of state regulations governing alcohol sales and distribution.
The lawsuit filed by The Obscure Distillery against the NYSLA raises critical questions about state-imposed restrictions on interstate commerce and the balance between state regulatory authority and constitutional protections. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the alcohol industry, potentially reshaping direct-to-consumer shipping laws and challenging longstanding distribution systems.
For more information on wine and alcohol laws, please contact Lindsey Zahn.
DISCLAIMER: This blog post is for general information purposes only, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship results. Please consult your own attorney for legal advice.