Skip to content
On Reserve
On Reserve

A Wine Law Blog

  • About Wine Law
  • About the Author
    • Author Bio
    • Appearances
  • Services
    • Permits
    • TTB
    • New York State
  • Contact
    • Standards
  • Reviews
    • December 2014
    • February 2015
    • February 2017
    • February 2018
    • August 2019
    • February 2020
    • April 2023
On Reserve

A Wine Law Blog

Tag: USPTO

The Trademark Battle of Jamieson Ranch Vineyards and Pernod’s Irish Distillers

Lindsey A. Zahn, July 29, 2014December 15, 2014

In March, Jamieson Ranch Vineyards launched a declaratory judgment suit against Pernod Richard’s Irish Distillers Limited, owner of the renowned Jameson Irish Whiskey, in response to the Ranch’s receipt of a cease and desist letter. See Jamieson Vineyards Takes On Pernod Ricard’s Irish Distillers. According to Jameson Clashes with Jamieson Over Name, the letter issued by Irish Distillers…

Continue Reading

A Trademark Double Entendre: N2 Versus Into Wines

Lindsey A. Zahn, April 30, 2014December 15, 2014

Here’s an interesting scenario. Can a trademark applicant’s mark ever have multiple meanings? And can such dual-meaning mark be issued a trademark even if one of its meanings is deemed merely descriptive? In a recent appeal to the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, administrative…

Continue Reading

No Likelihood of Confusion for Domaine Pinnacle Apple Juice and Pinnacles Ranches Wine

Lindsey A. Zahn, November 25, 2013December 15, 2014

Domaine Pinnacle, Inc., a Canadian-based apple orchard and cidery, filed an intent-to-use application to register a mark in International Class 33 for apple juices and non-alcohol-based beverages on December 30, 2005 (mark pictured right). The description of the mark is as follows: “The mark consists of A drawing of an…

Continue Reading

Prêt à Boire: A Mark “Ready to Register” on the USPTO Supplemental Register

Lindsey A. Zahn, October 23, 2013December 15, 2014

On September 30, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board  issued a decision, In Re Amuse Bouche LLC, for Trademark Application No. 77965809, originally filed March 23, 2010. See In Re Amuse Bouche LLC, Application No. 77965809 (September 30, 2013). Scott Bibb was the Trademark Examining Attorney and the…

Continue Reading

A Scarlet and The Scarlet Letter: The Story of In re Steele Wines, Inc.

Lindsey A. Zahn, September 19, 2013December 15, 2014

In July of 2012, Steele Wines, Inc. filed an application to register a mark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office asserting use in commerce since May 2012. See 15. U.S.C. § 1051(a). The mark, which is pictured below, features the words, “A Scarlet 2009 Lake County Red Wine” with a woman in…

Continue Reading

From Water to Wine (Trademark): Joel Gott Wines v. Rehoboth Von Gott

Lindsey A. Zahn, August 5, 2013June 15, 2018

On June 26, 2013, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) found a likelihood of confusion between the marks JOEL GOTT and GOTT LIGHT. Rehoboth Von Gott, Inc. filed an application with USPTO to register the mark GOTT LIGHT for nutritionally fortified water…

Continue Reading

Trademark Infringement Suit Filed in California Court Between “Mommyjuice” and “Mommy’s Time Out”

Lindsey A. Zahn, April 21, 2011August 21, 2014

On Monday, a lawsuit was filed in a federal court in California claiming that the “Mommyjuice” of California-based winery Clos Lachance Wines violates the trademark of “Mommy’s Time Out,” a wine marketed by a New Jersey wine distributor. (See Wine for “Mommy” Sets off Trademark Fight.) Both “Mommyjuice” and “Mommy’s Time Out”…

Continue Reading
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4

Subscribe to On Reserve

Follow Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on RSS

Search Posts

Categories

Archives

Awards

©2025 On Reserve | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes